Skip to content


Pit Bull Law Defeated in Elgin!

Pit bulls and the people who love them are breathing easier tonight now that the Elgin town council dumped the section of the new animal care and control ordinance that targeted the breed type.  They will instead institute a licensing law, according to Steve Dale’s blog.  The section of the ordinance dealing with dangerous dogs outlines stringent penalties, but does not include breed specific language.

Here’s the video report by Nancy Pender of Fox News. Look how well-attended that meeting was:

There was the threat of revisiting breed specific legislation should there be further pit bull incidents, but what we know is that it is the people who own the dogs that are responsible for dogs off  leash and whatever happens as a result.  

I think the Swiss have it right–you get a dog, you sign up for mandatory training.  It is something that has to be done in any case; it keeps the dog safe, you bond through the experience, and you have a good doggy citizen that won’t be seeing the inside of a shelter again when training is satisfactorily completed. 

As I had mentioned in another post, since the reason often cited for dogs being turned in or returned to shelters centers on behavior, maybe a well-heeled foundation or two would target a group of shelters and provide funds for training purposes for adopting families.  It would really make a great study and become one of the defining tools keeping dogs out of the shelter system…oh, but I digress;-)

I know it’s an absurdity, how many ordinary things we seem to be compelled to turn into prerequisites, ordinances, or legislation.  New rules are everywhere we turn. But when it comes to averting an injustice for animals, especially for a breed type so unfairly battered from both those eluding the law and those handing down judgement, I think it’s the least we can do.

Posted in general, news. Tagged with , , .

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

11 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Great news! Thanks for posting this update.

  2. Sue said

    W00T! We didn't make it to the meeting (I had a few non-breed specific mud trails to clean up and a couple of cat gifts, too!), but are thrilled with the outcome!

  3. Steve said

    Bravo to Elgin! A government entity displaying common sense- thank you!

  4. Yea!! That is fantastic news!

  5. Yeah, pretty great news:)

  6. norm in ontario said

    This news is great. It shows some Gov'ts listen.
    Unfortunately, not here in Ontario

Continuing the Discussion

  1. uberVU - social comments linked to this post on March 11, 2010

    Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by doggybytes: Pit Bull Law Defeated in Elgin! http://bit.ly/9dR9eh
    via @dancingdogblog…

  2. Doggy Bytes of the Week – Ending 03.13.2010 linked to this post on March 13, 2010

    [...] been a busy week over at Dancing Dog Blog. Being a Pit Bull owner this post Pit Bull Law Defeated in Elgin!stood out for me. The town of Elgin has decided to place the responsibility of the actions of a dog, [...]

  3. Fetching News – Week Ending 03.12.2010 linked to this post on March 13, 2010

    [...] covered the defeat of breed specific legislation (BSL) in Elgin, IL. A video shows the great turnout by pit bull owners to support their dogs’ presumption of [...]

  4. Doggy Bytes of the Week – Ending 03.20.2010 linked to this post on March 20, 2010

    [...] there are many people fighting and winning the war against BSL. Here’s an [...]

  5. Topics Discussed on Dog & Pet Blogs – Week Ending 05.01.2010 linked to this post on May 1, 2010

    [...] worked in Denver, Ontario or England. Some jurisdictions like the town of Elgin, Illinois are relaxing their stance on Pit Bulls, while other other cities like Omaha Nebraska, as reported by DancingDogBlog.com have [...]

Some HTML is OK

(required)

(required, but never shared)

or, reply to this post via trackback.